Throughout history, challenging affirmed knowledge has more often than not been equal to questioning authority; like in the time of Galileo, his statement of “earth travels around the sun” was almost tantamount to rebelling against the scientific world and caused extreme consternation for the church as authority of that time. That consequently, only whet more minds to reconsider their surroundings.
Blindly perpetuating the existing order is the model generally preferred by the authority figures since it keeps the masses malleable to their every whim and gullible in the face of lies. However, had our forefathers not refuted the norms of their times, we would not have excelled beyond living in caves and leading nomadic lives. A good example of challenging and questioning what is accepted is Aristotle. The Athenian philosopher lived in an era where he observed his fellow citizens dedicating their every effort to please the gods, burning incense as offering and fearing to question the logic behind their action or ponder about their surroundings. He started group discussions held in his garden, the most rudimentary form of school, to galvanize youth into observing nature and world and asking pertinent questions; an endeavor which its effects permeated in the works of intellects in years after that even though Athenian ruling class deemed it as an offense on their authority.
Additionally, established knowledge must also face constant scrutiny. Of course, since the claimer has the burden of proving their statement, they should be well educated and steeped in the respective area. As a matter of fact, the iconoclast in every field such as art, science as well as politics have also been the most devout it. Albert Einstein’s works on quantum physics undermined many of the accepted facts in Newtonian physics. He could only manage to transcend his mastery of physics due to his impeccable adroitness in the field accompanied by a healthy skepticism for the established facts.
It is through challenges and questions that a person, as a small part of the society, can advance beyond banal boundaries of the limitations imposed by establishment. But it’s boldness of such people has culminated in the modernized world we have inherited.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Question authority Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world 66
- An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high people visit the doctor only once or twice per 78
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned 65
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds reconsidering'.
Suggestion: minds reconsidering
...time. That consequently, only whet more minds to reconsider their surroundings. Blindly perpetuat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 991, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed it as an offense on their authority. Additionally, established knowledge must...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, of course, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30277777778 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90433769888 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619444444444 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5321156214 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.357142857 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193971074627 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602319895639 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560767637667 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117584133159 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620577361896 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.