Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Whether it is politics, business or a life of a common man, everyone tries to trick others to make a profit or for their benefits. Until those crimes or tricks are not recognized they are not scandals but they have been recognized they are termed as scandals because they can guide a wide range of people to be cautious and alert for them. Therefore, I concur with the fact that scandals focus our attention towards those problems which had affected others and we try to be more cautious about them.
On the first facet, one of the biggest fiddle in history was done by Frank Abagnale Jr. He was known for copy the cheques of various banks and used them withdraw money from the banks. Till then no one was aware of the fact that the cheques can be copied too. However, his actions made bankers to think and to make higher security standards. However, Frank Abagnale was hired by the bank itself to validate for the cheques but this scandal made everyone focus on the problem that no speaker could have made.
Furthermore, in India government lend money to high-class businessmen on their goodwill in the market. A high-class businessman Vijay Mallya was having a loan of over five hundred million. Due to a change in bank policies as guided by the government, the bank started questioning Vijay about the installments which he was not able to pay. Therefore, Mallya decided to leave the country with over five hundred million loans on him. This scandal has been treated as one of the darkest moments in Indian history and that lead to further more leery rules for giving loans.
Additionally, the terror attack of 26/11 in Mumbai, India also made the government to put more intense measures on the security. As a group of terrorist infiltrated Taj Hotel in Mumbai and slaughtered innocuous and benign people there. This event gave the cringe of fear to every citizen of India and coerced the government to enhance security standards. Not only in India but all around the world when any terror attack happened it rang a bell in the ears of government to reiterate all the systems and analyze where they are lacking.
In the crux, yes I do agree with the fact that scandals are useful as they focus our attention on problems and we analyze the problem more logically. It does not only alert the victim but it works as an alarm bell for thousands of people around the victim and they, in turn, become more prudent and heedful in their lives.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- High-profile awards such as the Nobel Prize are actually damaging to society because they suggest that only a few people deserve such recognition. 63
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 54
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 59
- “Nature’s Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature’s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in are 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...y are lacking. In the crux, yes I do agree with the fact that scandals are useful as they focus our a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67361111111 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39595633966 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511574074074 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.192212056 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217193569443 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573171175156 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916585463418 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1153903616 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883853465407 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.