Scientific theories build on the hypothesis. To start any scientific experiment, a scientist should have a question which he is acquiring answer for. So, without questioning facts and theories, the scientific field can not thrive. Earth would still be considered to be flat, without scientist questioning the prevailed fact at that time. When Aristotle gave a new theory as a geocentric model. In this model, the spherical earth believed to be the center of the universe, where is the sun, the moon, and stars revolve around the earth. This model gave way to an understanding of a more developed model by Copernicus, who introduced the heliocentric model. In the heliocentric model, the sun believed to be the center of the universe, which the earth and other planets revolve around. The development of the science led to the finding which considers the universe as a homogeneous state which doesn't have a center. This History is full of examples where scientific facts were proven to be wrong after a long time. So, previewing scientific facts critically will provoke science discoveries, and revive science.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 62
- people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwa 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 62
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ng facts and theories, scientific field cant thrive. Earth would still considered fl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...ic field cant thrive. Earth would still considered flat, without scientist questioning the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...the fact that the earth is spherical we wouldnt know that earth is hemispherical. Histo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...vive science. In the other hand, one cant start a new experiment without building...
^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Science
...ment without building on previous work. science is a collection of theories and facts. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Theories
... is a collection of theories and facts. theories are a valuable results of scientists ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ods and analysis which other scientists use to start his own discoveries. Furthermo...
^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l the scientific facts with skepticism. As a result, while questioning the facts...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60251046025 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97666325783 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548117154812 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6163626081 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316200359659 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101129017432 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767126494391 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201636965139 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757177351923 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.