The writer of the issue states that some people contend that students should just rely on their eagerness and aptitudes in a field of study which they are going to continue in a college; however some others are supporter of the idea that students should choose their field of study on basis of job availability for that area of specialization. In what follows the main reasons postulated by both groups are first discussed and then my own position will be expressed.
Those people who believe that students should use their potentials for selecting the apropos major highly rely on self-satisfactory decisions. As they believe people should love their field of study and beside that love, they should show the tendency needed for appropriately doing a task. On the other hand, they think having talents and interests in a field will increase the output of that work. For example, if a student fathoms mathematical issues inherently, he will continue knowing more about that field which is nearly in accordance with his own capacity. So, why he should be forced to select a major in which he doesn’t show any inclination?! Moreover, in this way his talent has been getting in used in such a positive and effective way.
As it was mentioned in the statement, there are some others who paradoxically do not believe in interest as a factor in choosing a field of study. Instead, they believe that college students should choose more cautiously and give more weight to job availability issue in such a way that they should anticipate existence of vacancies for their future job. To strengthen their position, they think that people should be aware of their society needs and plan to cover them to be more successful. What if someone continue his studies to an advanced level but he could not find a suitable job related to his field of expertise?! In fact, in this way he will get depressed as all his efforts through studying that major was fruitless.
As far as I am concerned, I should say that I lodge my opinion somewhere between the two positions. In fact, in order to have a beneficent and practical system of education, we should heed to both sides which is stated above. It means that having talent and tendency is half of the criteria needed for effectively choosing a field of study and the other half is society needs and job availability because we, as humans all love to earn money by ourselves having kind of independency financially to cover our desires and continue our life with the hope of being a successful and efficient member in society.
- The following appeared in a memo from the chairperson of the school board in the town of Saluda. "For the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High 30
- "College and university education should be free for all students, fully financed by the government." 50
- Arugument type - The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company. "Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marke 58
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'continues'.
Suggestion: continues
... to be more successful. What if someone continue his studies to an advanced level but he...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225469728601 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.160751565762 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0605427974948 0.0880659088768 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0480167014614 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0772442588727 0.0444667217837 174% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.152400835073 0.12292977631 124% => OK
Participles: 0.0459290187891 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7282704024 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0250521920668 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0897703549061 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0334029227557 0.0249443105267 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0187891440501 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2562.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 442.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7963800905 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.325791855204 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223981900452 0.280924506359 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165158371041 0.200843997647 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110859728507 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7282704024 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490950226244 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.1450677771 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 27.625 23.380412469 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1888070238 59.4972553346 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.125 141.124799967 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 23.380412469 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.0231900452 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.48175182482 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527199321546 0.391690518653 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107466562287 0.123202303941 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0644890171915 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489663984649 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157347578644 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190983936536 0.161403998019 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147337404802 0.0892212321368 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.423519431906 0.385218514788 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0448382781768 0.0692045440612 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39562681136 0.275328986314 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104762564732 0.0653680567796 160% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.