Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Those two opinions are clearly opposite. One follows a more passionate view, while the other is marked by a more apathic and glacial logical thinking. In my perspective the first one is the most appropriate, even if both of them have good points.
First of all, if someone is more skilled or has a particular passion toward a certain field, it is probably going to be more enthusiastic while studying it, thus getting better grades and with lesser effort. In fact in Italy during highschool many students find themselves in trouble, having to study for subjects they hate and they can't get really understand, but when they finnally get to the universitiy, they start achieving high marks.
Getting higher marks makes them far more competent in their specific sector than their companions who opted for a different approach: following the best field to get a good job. While the former get brilliant results, the latter may have some difficulties and just don't satisfy the aspectatives of the agencies. Those usually search for the best they can get from an increasing number of candidates, since during the years more and more teenagers decide to go to the university continuing the study. This means that when they have to decide who to hire and who not to, they prefere someone who actually enjoys his job and isn't frustrated for having to do something they don't like. After all, who would like to cooperate and work with someone who doesn't really fit for the job and is always depressed?
It can be infered that this problem shouldn't concern the ones who decided to follow the "easy" way, going for a field with plenty of available jobs, but in reality the world of work is not that simple, and even if there are more opportunities to hire someone, they will still prefer those who distinguished themselves during the studies. For example, there's plenty of agencies who want to assume informatics, but only the most skilled are able to get very good jobs, like at Google. Moreover, we live in a dynamic world, in which the fields who grant more opportunities may vary quite fast, and since many years pass before the student completes his journey to get the degree, the new best fields may have changed meanwhile.
Another objection may be that the salaries are usually lower, but this is true only when we compare two workers that have accomplished the same results. Probably a mere lower dipendent of one of the "best" fields gets less than someone who is an eminence in one that is considered less lucrative. There's plenty of professor who get really decent salaries from their service to the university, and with every publication they get a large amount of money.
What requires a further evaluation is the fact that during a lifetime we tend to change our interests. This means that even if when someone start to study is really enjoying the subject, after a few years he may change his mind. Unluckly it's difficult to predict when this could happen, but it's still better to try to pursue a passion and lose interest after a while, than giving up and not having the opportunity to enjoy it.
In conclusion, it is indoubtable that some fields offer more chances than other to get a decent job. But it is also true that if we don't try to do what we like and what we love, we are probably going to fail, renouncing at the opportunity to live the life we dream. So, in my opinion, the most important thing is to enjoy what we do, expecially if we are going to do it for the rest of our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kevlarpeng | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen 42
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 33
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o study for subjects they hate and they cant get really understand, but when they fi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ter may have some difficulties and just dont satisfy the aspectatives of the agencie...
^^^^
Line 4, column 623, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...someone who actually enjoys his job and isnt frustrated for having to do something t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 671, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...strated for having to do something they dont like. After all, who would like to coop...
^^^^
Line 4, column 747, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... to cooperate and work with someone who doesnt really fit for the job and is always de...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... It can be infered that this problem shouldnt concern the ones who decided to follow ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 362, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...selves during the studies. For example, theres plenty of agencies who want to assume i...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
... one that is considered less lucrative. Theres plenty of professor who get really dece...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 315, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun professor seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of professors'.
Suggestion: plenty of professors
...at is considered less lucrative. Theres plenty of professor who get really decent salaries from the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ent job. But it is also true that if we dont try to do what we like and what we love...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, thus, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2915.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 620.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70161290323 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98996985923 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57172804154 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 910.8 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1045007086 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120069634637 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392625303691 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415005489407 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607196605139 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270265107646 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.