While it is true that the primary concern of corporations should be making as much profits as possilbe, I believe it should not be the only responsibility of corporations. A company that should not focus solely on profits and they have a responsibility to promote and ensure the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate.
Corporations that focuses solely on profits will not be as sustainable. They might see a short term increase in profits but it might hurt their bottomline in the long run. For example, General Motors decision to relocate their company from the Midwest to South America was drivenly chiefly by the desire to cut down on labour cost. This resulted in a huge void in labour market of the Midwest, causing unemployment rate to soar and crime rates to increase. In turn, GM sales saw a hit due to the general resentment of the people towards the company.
Large companies that are involved in Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives help ensure that employees are satisfied with the companies role in helping the community. This can help attract like minded future employees to the company and help maintaining their best talents. Corporations will be able to serve their clients with better services which in turn will result increased profits for the company.
A company that promotes the wellbeing of the environment in which they operate will ensure their long term profit and substainability of their business. They will prevent many deleterous outcome that might befall them if their only concern is making profit, even within the limits of law. For example, an oil and gas company might choose to economize on worker safety training and equipments if they are no legal requirements on the matter. However, in an event of human error leading to enviromental catrastrophe similar to the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the company will be slapped with hefty fines, expensive lawsuits and restrive sanctions. All these combined will be costly of the the company in the long run and they would not have been worst off had they chosen to not focus sole on profits.
It can be argued that what is good for the company is also good for the people, hence why a corporation should focus only on making money. The company will be able to pay employees better wages and the quality of living will surely increase. However, this is a one-sided view on what constitutes quality of life. Society will be better off not only with higher GDP per capita, but also from various measurements such as better social cohesion and lower crime rates.
In conclusion, the primary purpose of corporations should be making profits in addition to championing the well-being of societies and environments. Focusing solely on profits might reap short term benefits but it is not suistanable, and corporations are better off balancing between making profits and ensuring the well-being of societies and environments.
- Argument Topic :“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improv 54
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 50
- Analysis of ArgumentThe following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant: It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire c 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 83
- The following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant:It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire city. 19,800 of them s 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ern of corporations should be making as much profits as possilbe, I believe it shoul...
^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...e that employees are satisfied with the companies role in helping the community. This can...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to maintain' or 'maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain; maintain
...uture employees to the company and help maintaining their best talents. Corporations will b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 692, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...s. All these combined will be costly of the the company in the long run and they would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 692, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...s. All these combined will be costly of the the company in the long run and they would ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256653992395 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.152091254753 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0893536121673 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0380228136882 0.0497285424764 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.041825095057 0.0444667217837 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12927756654 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0380228136882 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79397817823 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285171102662 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00570342205323 0.0016655270985 342% => OK
Determiners: 0.0893536121673 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437262357414 0.0249443105267 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0209125475285 0.0148568991511 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2954.0 2732.02544248 108% => OK
No of words: 491.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01629327902 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37067209776 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272912423625 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169042769857 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114052953157 0.132149295362 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79397817823 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 219.290929204 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470468431772 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.9601248549 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.380952381 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1949884521 59.4972553346 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.674092028746 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 50.6721947435 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.82786885246 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544029557788 0.391690518653 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127762936032 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0806607150525 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.568594458027 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140537578746 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212658986523 0.161403998019 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114130439729 0.0892212321368 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.339598762209 0.385218514788 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.042404305199 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353054737444 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111042320144 0.0653680567796 170% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.