Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented
No doubt that the main purpose and function of corporations is money-making, this is how economics works. But is this the only and one responsibility of them? Can we rebuke companies for lacking in promoting of well-being of society and environments? Such socially oriented politics would bring great benefits for companies in different ways, but probably even more important point is its long-lasting effect.
Obviously that corporations are the inherent part of our society. The source of income for them is consumers who have own attitudes and worries on different problems of nowadays such as climate change, ecology, social interactions and so on. Showing the indifference to global problems that disturb society would attract potential consumers. Not to be unsubstantiated let us consider the well-known and popular Swedish company, IKEA. Its politics and advocacy regarding ecology seems really attractive and inspiring.
Also the other integral human part of corporations is their employers. Providing good conditions will stimulate them to work and increase their productivity what consequently results in greater profits for company. Such a humanistic approach will be appealing for potential employers and inevitably lead to expanding of corporation. Different benefits such as health insurance, different teaching programs, and of course food supply during workday and amazing corporative holidays will leave nobody indifferent. Who would not like to work in Google with its infinite coffee and cheerful office design?
Taking this purely capitalistic standpoint and caring just of incomes for corporations seems logic from the economic point of view. But from the social one it is sounds like “After us, the deluge”. Companies have a huge human constituent so promoting the well-being of the society and environment will bring the long-term benefits as it was shown above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | fugitate | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | underwoodkats1 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 54
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 43
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ems really attractive and inspiring. Also the other integral human part of corpor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, really, regarding, so, well, no doubt, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64459930314 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07123043507 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3956817064 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2941176471 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136509316208 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046070338328 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513646511739 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848006099449 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029989953938 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.