Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In this modern society, the most common way to access information is by newspaper, television, radio, internet, etc. We all live in a society where our government is elected by public. So our representatives (government) know well enough how much of information is to be disclosed to public. So it is not necessary to disclose all the information to the public.
By revealing all the information to public may sometime cause damage to the society. These information may fall in to wrong hands and may take advantage of them .For example in the wiki leak case where classified information was leaked by Bradley Manning known as whistle blower to the public. That information was accessible by terrorist organization and they could take advantage of them. So informing the public about this sensitive matter caused more damage to American government rather than good. stations
Sometimes by making aware of complete information to public may cause panic, chaos. When people are in panic they take terrible steps may even damage public property, they may violate rules. For example if someone place a hoax call and says there is going to be a bomb explosion today at the train station and if that news is out the people in the train station may run panic ,helter-skelter and damage public property. Instead the authorities are made aware of it and send a canine and bomb squad to detect the bomb which would palliate the situation. Certain situations are better handled by the authorities or the experts than making public aware of it.
At certain times public has to get complete information of the situation to stay alert. Few months back center for disease council declared that water park at Arkansas was contaminated with deadly bacteria which caused a brain disease called meningitis. This information had to be made public to the people which could alert people form going to that water park and nearby water parks.
The information relaying centers like newspaper agency, television channels, radio stations, etc. have to be aware that the information they are reporting should be useful to people and does not damage the welfare of government and the public.
So it is alright to withhold information by political leaders from public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 94
- It is compulsory for children to attend school between the age of 5 and 16. Many people are in favor of raising the age at which children must start their schooling to 6 or 7, and the age at which they are allowed to stop to 17 or 18. People of this view 56
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 58
- Artificial Intelligence- treat or threat 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'These informations'?
Suggestion: This information; These informations
...y sometime cause damage to the society. These information may fall in to wrong hands and may take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ong hands and may take advantage of them .For example in the wiki leak case where ...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...g hands and may take advantage of them .For example in the wiki leak case where cla...
^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stations
...o American government rather than good. stations Sometimes by making aware of complet...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'places'.
Suggestion: places
...y violate rules. For example if someone place a hoax call and says there is going to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eople in the train station may run panic ,helter-skelter and damage public propert...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ter-skelter and damage public property. Instead the authorities are made aware of it an...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276119402985 0.240241500013 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.174129353234 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0820895522388 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0348258706468 0.0497285424764 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0323383084577 0.0444667217837 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0995024875622 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.044776119403 0.0406280797675 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73566117468 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0522388059701 0.030933414821 169% => OK
Particles: 0.00248756218905 0.0016655270985 149% => OK
Determiners: 0.0870646766169 0.0997080785238 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0273631840796 0.0249443105267 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174129353234 0.0148568991511 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2248.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 372.0 452.878318584 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04301075269 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379032258065 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255376344086 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174731182796 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134408602151 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73566117468 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513440860215 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.4604186558 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5789473684 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6735985251 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.315789474 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.315789473684 0.674092028746 47% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 45.116581777 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.74226804124 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401032887933 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155817940306 0.123202303941 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0959955094725 0.077325440228 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556533539942 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194393650071 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167605474461 0.161403998019 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836085343677 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.29882329532 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.116451671167 0.0692045440612 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267555502677 0.275328986314 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258800959639 0.0653680567796 40% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.