Political leaders are public representatives. They are exalted to that position by the public mandate so it is their sole responsibility to engage themselves in public welfare. They should advocate to bring justice to one who is oppressed, to ensure the government policies are implemented properly and to stand side by side with the public, whenever and wherever required. But having said that does not, at all mean, that politicians should safeguard the public when and if they are not correct or a sect of public demand something that is against the overall community. Many aspects will be analyzed in the following paragraphs.
For first, we should analyze that are there any parameters that define a good politician? The obvious answer would be no there are not. But one would be able to fetch the answer if, characteristics, qualities, decisions and policies of great leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Nelson Mandela is analyzed. The most prominent quality of these politicians was the flexibility of their decisions. They have taken many momentous decisions during their reign but all were influenced by the welfare of public as a whole and not dedicated to group of people. For example, the abolishing the slavery was in favor of the entire public thereby giving everyone fair chance to grow and prosper. It is that law which has given many black origin scientists.
Another point to be considered is the dilemma that if a political leader even gives up the principle for the benefit of the people, will a large group of people ever find a consensus on any issue? One can imagine how difficult it will be for the political leader to come to conclusion. Consider for example, that one group of people want to region to be opened to new industries that would bring employment to the region. While another group of the people claims that though this could bring some employment but the after effects in the form of environment pollution will be devastating. Now in that it should be a political leader who should weigh down the pros and cons, and then come to a conclusion.
Looking at the other facet of the coin, one might claim that political leader should take the decisions only after concurrence of the public since he is elected by the public. But this claim is fallible because if the political leader himself is not committed to certain objectives then how will the people, who tend to follow their political leaders.
All in all, sticking to the objectives and commitments is better approach for public welfare. Such exemplary political leader will not only motivate the young generation but he will be able satiate the public altogether.
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 83
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 75
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as given many black origin scientists. Another point to be considered is the di...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able satiate the public altogether.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95322939866 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70876247754 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496659242762 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5064071989 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.904761905 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231578731889 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757474357703 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547569612176 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133957761082 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372570024137 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.