Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
In today's world, education to a person plays a very vital role. A person to become good future citizen and an epitome of mankind, education is very much necessary. I believe that the education must be made avail to all students with a logical backdrop. This logical based teaching provides more vision for a person to think from all perspective. With this logical think, automatically come the morality which will ultimately produce the logical society.
I believe that the logical teaching conceal the moral values. Hence, I agree with author's statement that teaching logical reasoning would more produce a moral society.
In many countries, a teaching system is adopted which will help the students to learn the things in a logical way. Because of this methodology, the country is improving day by day in all fields. It is helping the people to think widely and find the root cause of the problems. For example, there are some countries due to its thick population, has implemented strict traffic rules. Say, one of the traffic rule says that the speed limit should be forty within city limits. The people who are aware the logical reason behind this rule will follow the rule which will be helpful to the other drivers. Others who do not know the reason behind this will make mistakes and cause accidents, which is not safe for the other drivers around. The morality thought that a driver has while driving, has a logic reason which should be taught while teaching.
Although the previous paragraph is stressing on the logical reasoning the moral education is also important. The students should be taught the moral values at their very young age for examples with some stories, so that they will try to follow these stories while they grow. After certain age, if these moral thoughts are given logical background, then these values become more entrenched in them and will never go out of the moral line.
Thus, in total, the logical foundation in all aspects are important even more than just teaching the moral values. The moral values are the base. But when this base is wrapped with the logical thought, it will make the person more wise in moral values and definitely the man will follow the moral values and finally becomes a good of mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l help the students to learn the things in a logical way. Because of this methodology, the count...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich should be taught while teaching. Although the previous paragraph is stressing on ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, so, then, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86010362694 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33913579841 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49481865285 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3835077637 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363909664721 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115827553921 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873135178757 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228992068272 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866950328388 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.