Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Logical reasoning is not the only factor that helps to create a moral society. Apart from that, morality cannot be enforced on someone until the person himself accepts what is difference between wrong and right behavior within a society.
One of the greatest contributing factor could be elders and peers. Children's basically imitate their elders and try to reproduce the same behaviors as elders do. Education might prove to be a mere theoretical concept for morality but practically accepting the behaviors completely depends on a given individual. Hence, although education might prove to be foundation for teaching of moral behaviors, it completely depends on a person, either to accept it or just avert from it.
Logical reasoning helps to some extent distinguish between what is wrong and right in a society. But having it as a single measure to build an entire structure of moral behaviors might prove to be unsuccessful. For example, suppose an individual joins a workplace and is completely unknown by the rules and regulations followed inside a particular project. He might then, just by following some prescribed rules try to maintain a moral behavior without actually implementing those in day to day tasks. This might not only affect his progress within an organization but might affect the project as well. Hence, only following a given prescribed rules might not suffice the need of project, but instead, following those rules with some logical reasoning might be fruitful for progress of a person as well as society.
Moral society is not just an amalgam of the above two factors, but indeed has some other points to be taken into consideration such as influences, behavior of an individual, etc. Hence, only considering logical reasoning or education to be the contributing factors would be obfuscated. After all, it depends on a particular person whether he will follow a given behavior or just ward off from it.
Implementing logical reasoning in educating moral behaviors might be the best way to produce a moral society. But thinking only for one side might not prove to be sufficient. Individual must himself try to maintain a moral behavior and must be able to differentiate between what is wrong or right in a given society. Therefore, although a person should be educated about morality, but education itself, alone, doesn't prove to be the foundation stone for morality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above?Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 70
- The following appeared as part of the Dean’s newsletter:"The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students. We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well-rounded 77
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 63
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... morality, but education itself, alone, doesnt prove to be the foundation stone for mo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, after all, apart from, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16326530612 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85353270461 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448979591837 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.218065082 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.526315789 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254799752655 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924015071465 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720904597938 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160641157939 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385338167624 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.