Education is one of the most aspects of today's society, and nowadays, how to educate students is one of the hottest matters of debate. Some people hold the idea that pupils should take various courses in order to broaden their knowledge in different fields. However, others, with whom I comply, believe that the advantages of taking only relevant courses outweigh its disadvantages. Students should only take those courses that are likely to be conducive to their future careers. In what follows, I will delineate my viewpoint on the ground of two persuasive reasons.
Without a doubt, the most consequential point corroborating my stance on this subject is that students should increase their knowledge in their field of study to a great extent in order to be able to find a promising and suitable job or research position after graduation. Pupils can improve their skills and knowledge by taking only those courses that are relevant to their field of interest, and picking irrelevant courses is regarded as nothing but a waste of time. For instance, imagine a student majoring in Aerospace Engineering. The university where he studies requires him to pick a course about the history of Islam due to religious matters in his country. Accordingly, that pupil cannot select a course about programming or machine learning which are certainly fruitful for his future in both academic and work aspects because he does not have enough time to pick both these two courses. Thinking rationally, one can conclude that not only does picking a variety of courses about different irrelevant subjects dissipates students' time and energy, but it is also detrimental to them. Nowadays, every field of study offers the vast majority of materials that even if students took all the required and optional courses in that field, there would still be some new subjects to learn.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that making students pick courses that they do not like or think would not have any impact on their future, they have a tendency to not study them well. They would not attend those classes and would not take those courses seriously. As a result, they get low scores in those courses, which negatively affects their overall GPA and self-confidence. Cumulative GPA is one of the conspicuous factors that every employer or professor uses to compare different applicants. Therefore, those students have a lower chance of finding a suitable job or appropriate research position in the future just because their previous university made them pick courses that had nothing to do with their major.
To make the long story short, and reflecting upon all the aforementioned grounds, one soon realizes that concentration is always better than jumping from one branch to another. Pupils, if they want to warranty their future in both academic and work environments, must only pick those courses that are the most relevant to their field of study. If the university in which they study requires them to pick irrelevant courses to their major, the students have to contradict this decision.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis i 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 66
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessels were about 2 200 years old Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The a 52
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, of course, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2654.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08429118774 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67643101569 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490421455939 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1183278567 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.7 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320961346309 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10608365238 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680371249629 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210706120176 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583150044225 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, of course, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2654.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08429118774 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67643101569 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490421455939 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1183278567 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.7 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320961346309 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10608365238 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680371249629 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210706120176 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583150044225 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.