Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has advanced drastically over the last few decades. Technology is aimed to simplify out life and has apparently done so for most of the part. But, sentiment over this statement varies from person to person, I partly agree with the statement.
Foremost, Development of new machines and technology has made us more dependable on them and given us the time to think on other important matters. For instance, the washing machine has freed us from the daily chore of washing clothes. Cars have been developed for us to commute places faster, instead of walking cycling. Earlier, trains were used to commute the long distance and now flights have been developed which have reduced out commute time drastically.
Technology has made us more dependent no them, however, it is not totally good.
Before vehicles were developed people used to travel by walking, which in turn is good for health, as it keeps a person healthy. One major negative the development of technology has is that caused unemployment. People who used to earn money by manual have been replaced by machines which are much cheaper in the long run for the employer and is more precise than humans.consequently, technology has made the life for these workers more complicated.
In conclusion, the technology has majorly made out life easier, but for some, it has made their life more complicated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | ritobhash | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | kanishkbar4321@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | laurelstockwell | 50 | view |
- Explain the points made in the lecture on how they cast doubt with the points in the reading passage. 3
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 227.0 442.535393258 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06607929515 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81515376589 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57268722467 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1561334581 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116299852025 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445511537162 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358822664762 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666784073508 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327712132727 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.