Self- reliance is one, if not the most important aspect of growth of an individual. The capacity of trusting one's gut is not always innate, and through conscious self-work, can turn the fortunes of people. The prompt argues that people who can see their own ideas taking shape in the future, can make a mark for themselves and generations to come, regardless of the multitude of hindrances they might encounter on their path to success. I strongly agree with the same for three reasons.
To begin, creativity and innovation knock the door of many, but there are only a handful of people who actually take the risk of implementation. This is a mere combination of skill and self- confidence. If one has the ability to place trust in these two aspects, it is highly likely that one will pave a way, or rather break ground for themselves. For instance, at a time when technological advancement was not at peak in India, Narayan Murthy, a small- town man from a very humble background envisioned transforming the information technology sector in the country. Despite harsh criticism and several situations that seemed like dead-ends, his belief in himself and his idea enabled him to make history.
Secondly, I believe that in the process of facing harsh criticism and crippling doubt, one who sees their ideas through, has the ability to turn a deaf ear to the same and build endurance against it. Once one is immune the same, a sense of vengeance is instilled, a sense of proving people wrong. Elaborating on the previous instance, the wife of Narayan, Sudha Murthy was among the first female engineering students in the country who shared the same vision as Narayan. Consequently, she was constantly belittled and her motives were questioned by the society. However, since she was outright adamant to prove her criticisers wrong, she, in fact, did so.
Furthermore, if we assume that one tackles all the hardhips faced on the way to success, one most likely turns their haters into admirers. The ability to reach the pinnacle despite the immense doubt, is a testament of trustworthiness. Research has constantly shown that people who face hardships early in their career are most likely to work their way to success.
Of course, some argue that one's ability to see their ideas through is not an integral part of making it to the apex. However, this would indicate that success is purely an amalgamation of external factors. Therefore, to state that it is an imperative factor in leaving a lasting legacy, would not be incorrect.
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 70
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 83
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 69
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 83
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... the door of many, but there are only a handful of people who actually take the risk of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9020979021 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76346986969 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582750582751 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2613717169 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.15 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258167748226 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065027507776 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701442416585 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134585010887 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296597116591 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... the door of many, but there are only a handful of people who actually take the risk of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9020979021 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76346986969 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582750582751 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2613717169 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.15 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258167748226 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065027507776 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701442416585 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134585010887 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296597116591 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.