In order to gain a clear view of a society, a variety of data sources and perspectives must be consulted and appreciated. The proportion of city residents to rural residents is rapidly changing. Society is becoming increasingly urban and globalized as the domain of cities encroaches on rural areas. It may be suggested then, that due to this demographic paradigm shift, a clear summary of a society can be garnered by examing its cities. However, there are several flaws in this position.
Throughout history, there have always been considerable differences in city and rural life. Rome saw a centralized, developed government yield to the problems of imperial expansion. The city of Rome, differed greatly from the outlying lands of the empire, which held considerable stakeholders in the power and cultural expansion of the empire. Roman citizenry enjoyed access to advanced infrastructure and engineering technologies, but rural Roman subjects' experience differed greatly. It would be unwise to ignore or marginalize the importance of Rome's colonies to its success. It fact, it is often argued that the mismanagement of the occupied and outlying lands of the empire led to its downfall.
Modern nations also face great contrasts between their major cities and the sentiment of the nation. In present-day Italy, there are considerable lifestyle and cultural differences between the North and South, so much so that the concept of Italy splitting into two nations has been entertained. Northern Italy is more metropolitan compared to southern italy and ignoring the shipping and manufacturing prowess of the south, due to their lack of major cities, would not be conducive to understanding Italian society. the The modern United States demonstrates the problem with ignoring the demographics of suburban and rural residents. Cultural and social mores in San Francisco, California differ greatly from those in Charlottesville, Virginia even though San Francisco is much more prominent, for example. Can one understand the sentiments of the United States by simply examining major-city life? Of course not. Due to the electoral college, the representation of rural peoples is augmented to balance the representative of powers of more urban regions. In assessing the sentiments of the United States, it would be erroneous to neglect the characteristics of life in rural areas, even though, most citizens live in cities.
In conclusion, in order to obtain a clear snapshot of the important characteristics of a society, one must be aware of the differences in rural and urban populations and their representativeness. One could not look at the 10 most populous cities in the United States and account for the differences in culture, governing, education, and infrastructure, among other things without appreciating those living outside of major cities. However, as the influence of cities grows meteorically, their capacity to represent a society grows as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'lifestyles'?
Suggestion: lifestyles
...esent-day Italy, there are considerable lifestyle and cultural differences between the No...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ucive to understanding Italian society. the The modern United States demonstrates t...
^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ucive to understanding Italian society. the The modern United States demonstrates the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'The' is left.
Suggestion: the; The
...ucive to understanding Italian society. the The modern United States demonstrates the p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21351310551 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5231427973 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.52173913 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82608695652 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208929435005 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495112327605 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657351704689 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121472651914 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637862615797 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.