Sometimes, the authority secure the sustainability of the society. But at the same time, unless the authority is well monitored and scrutinized, it can be harmful to the society and the members who living in there. So that the ways of questioning to the authority is the important issue.
In case that the question against authority is presented in reasonable ways, it is efficacious for both of individuals and society. Because it leads to the progress by overcoming the existing norm which is not proper for the contemporary period anymore. For example, in Joseon dynasty, the difference roles and statuses between women and men were accepted widely. However, after modernizing period, many people questioned to the culture, and finally materialize the equality between gender. And these equality allowed many women to participate in several activities, and eventually it has played salient role to enhance the happiness of individual women.
Moreover, the questioning to the authority is also beneficial for the society as a whole. Because the conforming to the authority without any question causes the lack of creativity which is crux of the development of the society. For instance, the size of industry of the steel in Korea which once achieved its huge success, now decreases, in virtue of the lack of creativity. And many economy experts analyze that the lack of creativity is happened because the new members of the industry habitually rely on authority of the existing members who achieved success before. As the example well indicates, unless the questions against the authority are made, the society can not keep advancing.
However, if the question is made in the arbitrary ways, it causes several problems. First of all, the aimless questioning to the authority is resulted into the serious inefficiency. Because limitless oppositions from the various perspectives generate conflicts between opinions. For example, in Korea, the many people are divided into the party in politics and conflicting each other. In course of the fighting, many people unreasonably try to debunk the any attempts made by opposite side. And this conflicts makes huge inefficiency in politic, and hinder the actualizing any policy. Without the reasonable debates, the questioning becomes the vacant and meaningless jarring.
In summary , because the capacity to questioning to the authority has the positive repercussion, it should be encouraged. But as mentioned above, if the questions are suggested in unreasonable ways, they cause a lot of and permanent conflicts. Therefore the question to authority should be made in reasonable ways.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 77
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 62
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 55
- Issue Task 28 The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with t 50
Many economic analysts…
Many economic analysts believe that the lack of originality occurs because new members of the sector are used to relying on the authority of previous successful members. As the case clearly shows, society cannot progress until doubts about power are raised. backrooms
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ty and the members who living in there. So that the ways of questioning to the authorit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equality' or 'these equalities'?
Suggestion: this equality; these equalities
...ialize the equality between gender. And these equality allowed many women to participate in se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... beneficial for the society as a whole. Because the conforming to the authority without...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...resulted into the serious inefficiency. Because limitless oppositions from the various ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and meaningless jarring. In summary , because the capacity to questioning to ...
^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...cause a lot of and permanent conflicts. Therefore the question to authority should be mad...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38647342995 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98743291258 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5670418158 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.9565217391 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177702621585 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536370439759 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327231997042 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986694201779 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253428510398 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.