Historical building provides information regarding the history of mankind. These buildings not only provide information about the living style of our forefathers but also help us to study the eye opening architectures of the past. It is a topic of consistent debate, whether government should demolish historic buildings or should preserve it. In my opinion, government should try to maintain balance between the past, present and future requirements of a nation.
First and foremost, there are many constructions from the past that helped us to understand the history. For example, the Stonehenge in Britain is world's most astounding construction, which baffle all of us till today. It is still ambiguous to historians that how people of that age constructed such architecture when few construction tools were available. The Sphinx and Pyramids of Egypt are also great buildings which helped to gather information about the civilization of that time. Apart from these great buildings mentioned above there are many other less known monuments which contributes to enhance the knowledge of history of our ancestors.
Besides this, demolishing historical buildings is not a good decision although it will serve the purpose of present society. There are many forts and palaces which are converted into hotels, and they also house malls within it. Thus, new construction is done while keeping the old building intact. This is the best solution, as it is striking a balance between the historical edifice and present needs of a society. This type of idea, augments tourism and also provides employment to large number of local people.
Last but not the least, it is not easy to maintain such balance between the past and present. For example, if there is an oil rig underneath a historical architecture. In such case, is it justified to demolish the old building? Or government should preserve the architecture and should let go the oil rig? It is a difficult situation, wherein government should try to keep the building intact and at the same time should try to extract the oil.
To sum up, I would like reiterate my point, that government should try to keep balance between past, present, and future requirements of a society. Demolishing a historical architecture is like erasing a part of history. Hence, old buildings should be preserved and as discussed above can be used for the modern purposes by not impacting the architecture of building.
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 66
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 60
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 85
- "Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a re 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... malls within it. Thus, new construction is done while keeping the old building i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for example, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18891687657 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92312578032 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511335012594 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8206761706 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187838611786 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05583825892 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664777298222 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109778890011 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521962684917 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.