The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Given are the charts providing clear information about the causes of worldwide land degradation and the effects of this process on certain regions for the period of 1990s.
A glance at the pie-chart reveals that the main reason of the damage of the land was considered over grazing made by cattle which indicates approximately 35 % and was marginally ahead of deforestation with the indicator of 30 %. Meanwhile, about two fifth of the world area became less productive due to over cultivation, followed by other activities which is 7 %.
Referring to the table it can also be noted that the majo...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-03 | Dhani Aristya | 63 | view |
2014-01-03 | cut muftia keumala | 73 | view |
2014-01-02 | naflaawfiyah | 60 | view |
2013-12-01 | orduhan | 73 | view |
2013-12-01 | qazzass | 40 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 75
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 71
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 64
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 997 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.941 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.78 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4