It is obvious that increasing the price of petrol is the easiest way to tackle traffic and pollution in the short run which is lead to reducing the number of cars on streets. The government can not overlook that traffic and pollution are two main problems that need to be solved by the best strategies for long term.
When the government increase the price of petrol, the people who use this fuel try to gain it by anyway even if the way was dangerous or bad because they need this fuel and moreover the other people try to abuse from this situation and they make black markets which some people sell petrol with huge price and people who need it have to purchase.
On the other hand, factories that produce cars with petrol fuel go to bankruptcy because people intend to buy these cars so these factories try to produce the other cars that consume the other kinds of fuels and are cheaper than those cars what used expensive fuel. It is clear that when these factories produce these cars with mass production methods, the traffic problem increase twice as huge as when the people use the other cars with petrol fuel and aggravate the problem of traffic in the long term.
I think when the government try to invest on public transportation and equip them by decent facilities and encourage the people use these public transportation little by little rate of users who use the public transportation increase which would not be happen if the government do not pay more attention to public transportation and why people do not fond to take the public transportation for their daily travel.This strategy lead to declining the amount of traffic which is absolutely cause to decrease pollution.
In conclusion, I think that increasing the price of petrol is not permanent way to decrease amount of traffic and the government must invest on public transportation and try to increase the level of aware of people to use this way which is lead to decreasing density of traffic and pollution.
- Advertisement lead to high sales, agree or disagree 67
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.To what extent do your agree or disagree. 66
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as 73
- Of Altamonte students polled, 65 percent say they participate in either an intramural, varsity, or community sports team. Being a member of a sport team keeps one fit and healthy and promotes an active life style. Since the majority of students are taking 80
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
Sentence: When the government increase the price of petrol, the people who use this fuel try to gain it by anyway even if the way was dangerous or bad because they need this fuel and moreover the other people try to abuse from this situation and they make black markets which some people sell petrol with huge price and people who need it have to purchase.
Description: The fragment government increase the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace increase with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 43.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.885 7.5
Need more different words and don't forget punctuation marks.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 347 350
No. of Characters: 1621 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.316 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.671 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.538 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 43.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.885 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.465 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.689 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5