The line graph represents the variation of food intake of Chinese population in a 25 year period. It can be clearly seen that fish and meat consumption follows an almost the same trend, while salt intake plummeted steadily in between 1985 and 2010.
Let us take a look at the meat and fish consumption. In 1985 to 1990, both slowly inclined. The first one started from 100 and rose slightly to 150 grams per person per week, while the latter on the same period of time shot up from 600 to 700 grams per person perweek. From 1995 to 2000, meat consumption maintained its acceleration to 180 before i...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: BLACK WOLF
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- "Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree?" 50
- The bar chart below shows the reasons for internet usage among British adults(2001) 80
- It is believed that everyone should have an ambition to become successful in life Is it really important to have these ambitions Is being ambitious good or bad 63
- Some people think the environmental protection can only be addressed at international level. Do you agree or disagree? 70
while the fish intake in 1990 to 1995, dramatically dropped back to 600
while the fish intake dramatically dropped back to 600 in 1990 to 1995
Sentence: The first one started from 100 and rose slightly to 150 grams per person per week, while the latter on the same period of time shot up from 600 to 700 grams per person perweek.
Error: perweek Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: In 1985 to 2010, it started from 500 and continously slumped and it reached its lowest peak of 200 in year 2010.
Error: continously Suggestion: continuously
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 791 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.394 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.363 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.891 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.408 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4