The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The graph depicts the amount of goods transported by 4 types of transport in the UK from 1974 to 2002, in 28 years time proportion.
In 1974, the highest quantity of goods was transported by road ways. In these 28 years, the amount of transportation by road increased from 70 million tons to 100 million tons. Again in 2002 the most used transportation mode of goods was road.
Coming to the water and rail shipping, the amounts were the same in 1974 (40 million tons). While transportation by water rose to 65 million tons, stability was observed in rail way shipping in 2002.
On the other hand, in 1974 transporting goods by pipeline was not popular like the others. That is why the amount was 5 million tons. At the end of this time proportion, the number grew 4 times and again became the least used transport method of goods in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-09-23 | uday.narang | 87 | view |
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with knowledge and skills needed n the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is 30
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 70
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 45
flaws:
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Different Words: 77 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Characters: 667 1000
No. of Different Words: 77 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.511 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.388 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.586 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 34 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 26 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.087 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.222 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.689 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4