The bar charts demonstrate the percent of people who had personal computers in different years and also the impact of the level of education on the computer ownership is revealed. Overall, with the passage of time, people had more passion for possessing computers.
The first chart illustrates an upward trend for the amount of the folks who had computers from 2002 to 2010. In detail, in 2002, lower than 60% of people held computers and after a steady rise, this figure reached to lower than 80%, in 2010.
Moving to the second chart, the level of education was entwined with computer ownership, inasmuch as the higher the level of education was, the more people had computers. To illustrate, postgraduates ranked high among other groups with 75% and 95% computer ownership in 2002 and 2010 respectively, and it was followed by the group who had bachelor and college students and some who had diploma. Also, people who had no diploma ranked low with 15% and 40% computer ownership in 2002 and 2010 respectively.
To sum up, people's enthusiasm towards computers was fired over time and also education had something to do with computer ownership.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 80
- The diagram below shows how a hot water system in a house works. The table gives information about the efficiency levels. 80
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspiciou 70
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 45
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 193 200
No. of Characters: 925 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.727 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.793 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.587 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.008 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.498 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.748 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.157 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4