The pie chart describes the principal cause of the declining production of agricultural areas, while the table illustrates the effects of land degradation on three areas of the world in the year 1990.
It can be clearly seen in the pie chart that overgrazing represents more than half of the proportion, which was 35%, that causes land mutilation globally while other causes remained the lowest at 7%. This was followed by deforestation at 30% and over utilized land with less than 2% than the former.
However, in the outcome of land destruction by the region, Europe achieved the highest in deforestation and over-cultivation with 9.8% and 7.7%, and it also attained the pinnacle of 23% compared to the other three regions, while the percentage in over-grazing was garnered by Oceania at 11.3%, and this stands the second with 13%. North America stocked in its lowest values in all trends with overall total of 5%.
In conclusion, both data depicted a vast difference in their given trends.
- Please don't check this essay. I have to edit it. "Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree?" 30
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 70
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Refer o 60
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.http://www.ielts-ex 72
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 799 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.813 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.864 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.499 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.799 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4