The pie chart describes the principal cause of the declining production of agricultural areas, while the table illustrates the effects of land degradation on three areas of the world in the year 1990.
It can be clearly seen in the pie chart that overgrazing represents more than half of the proportion, which was 35%, that causes land mutilation globally while other causes remained the lowest at 7%. This was followed by deforestation at 30% and over utilized land with less than 2% than the former.
However, in the outcome of land destruction by the region, Europe achieved the highest in deforestation and over-cultivation with 9.8% and 7.7%, and it also attained the pinnacle of 23% compared to the other three regions, while the percentage in over-grazing was garnered by Oceania at 11.3%, and this stands the second with 13%. North America stocked in its lowest values in all trends with overall total of 5%.
In conclusion, both data depicted a vast difference in their given trends.
- Some people believe that cell phones should be for personal use only; Others, however, feel cell phones should be used mostly for work. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 70
- People were arrested and not arrested 33
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- some people think living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- "Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree?" 50
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 799 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.813 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.864 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.499 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.799 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4