Provided illustration gives data of television and radio audiences older than four yers in The United Kingdom through the day in period from October to December 1992.
It is obvious from the graph, that people mostly listened the radio during the day time, however, after midday, British population watched TV more than listened radio.
From 1 am to 6 am, both, TV and Radio zig-zagged from almost 3 to 5 per cent. Percentage of radio listeners dramatically raised from 6 pm and peaked to its maximum little above twenty-five per cent at 8 am, however over next hours, till almost 3 pm, amount of people listening radio remained dropping to roughly ten per cent. After 3 pm there were slight raise followed with descending tendency to initial five pre cent.
Despite rapid increase of radio audience in morning hours, percentage of people watching TV remained almost same with fluctuation from approximately three to seven per cent. From 11am, TV audience went up and meet radio audience at 1pm (15 per cent). From 1 pm, there is a significant increase in television audience with top of about 40 to 45 per cent of population older than 4 years from 6 pm to 9 pm. However, after 9 pm, there is a dramatic dip of TV audience to its beginning around eight per cent.
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic big cities. 78
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010. 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ained dropping to roughly ten per cent. After 3 pm there were slight raise followed w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...descending tendency to initial five pre cent. Despite rapid increase of radio audie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6981981982 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62094431051 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9782763803 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.