屏幕快照 2019-07-02 下午3.06.03

Essay topics:

屏幕快照 2019-07-02 下午3.06.03

The chart displays the export earnings in one country in various categories during 2015 and 2016 and the table compares the percentage change in values of different categories in 2016 compared with 2015.

It can be seen from the chart that petroleum products and engineered goods earned more money than other three items in both 2015 and 2016. In 2015, petroleum products brought the most money in all of the five categories (over 60 million dollars), followed by engineered goods, with about 55 million dollars. Gems and jewelry ranked the third, then agricultural products. Textiles earned the least money (around 25 million dollars). Similarly, the data of petroleum products and engineered products ranked the first and second respectively (62 and 61 million dollars). But the gap between them narrowed down dramatically. Also, gems and jewelry ranked the third, followed by the same data of agricultural products and textiles (around 32 million dollars).

The table shows that four of these categories displayed an upward trend in the value, while gems and jewelry showed a downward trend. Among the four items, textiles had a highest data (15.24%), followed by engineered good (8.5%), with agricultural products having the least change (0.81%). As for gems and jewelry, it declined by 5.18%.

In a word, although a little downward change in gems and jewelry, all other four items showed an upward change in values.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by user 地狱博士后 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...leum products brought the most money in all of the five categories over 60 million dollars...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...end. Among the four items, textiles had a highest data 15.24%, followed by engine...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, similarly, so, then, third, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18340611354 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5457129551 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0849941943 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.