About internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009
The graph given below illustrate about internet consumer in three states between 1999 and 2009. It can be seen that internet users increased considerably in all three countries over the timeframe. Canada was the highest amount of internet users and Mexico was the lowest. It is measured percentage.
From 1999, internet consumer in Canada was dramatic rose doubled for the next two years and reached a peak at 100 in 2009. While, internet consumers in USA stood at 20, higher than the other two countries and there was a significant increase of 40, from 20 and 60 between 1999 substantial growth in internet users of 15 during two years.
In 2005, the internet users in Canada still had an enormous climb of 25 till 2009. That increase bigger than internet users in USA. However intenert users in mexico in the middle of six-year at just under 50 and climbed gradually. Like two other states. And in the last period, amount of internet users in those country registered became the smallest consumer
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | tieuchanchau01230 | view | |
| 2023-02-02 | nguyen thai binh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | phuongchi17899 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-06 | luckydough55 | 52 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | Rajupatel | view |
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
- One Government s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the sama years 84
- Global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or Video 73
- What those kids are doing 89
- The proporation of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diet 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ease bigger than internet users in USA. However intenert users in mexico in the middle ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87719298246 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44958747135 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1058383956 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8181818182 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473487080511 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164448333453 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122666534528 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338161374448 0.15604864568 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115961565528 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.