The bar chart below gives information about water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of water used for three different purposes among four selected countries in 2010.
In general, China experienced the highest percentage of water consumption for Agriculture. Meanwhile, water used for Industry was the lowest portion in Australia.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, over 80 percent of water was used for Agriculture in China, while figures for this used in the USA and Russia just were a half and a third in turn. Additionally, Russia consumed 60 percent of water for Industry, whereas China and Australia just used 10 percent in total.
Another noticeable point from the chart is that water for Industrial use in the USA and Russia made up the largest figures by 40 percent and 60 percent respectively. By contrast, the figure for Industrial use in Australia took the smallest by just roughly 5 percent, in comparison with the biggest for Domestic use in the same country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | Thùy Linh 1494 | view | |
| 2021-07-02 | Thùy Linh 1494 | view | |
| 2020-08-08 | longle251198 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | Lam Pham | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | lauranguyen_97 | 78 | view |
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology DO you think it is positive or negative development 92
- The environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what 84
- The bar chart below shows the information about the population size in an area of UK and its birth rate and death rate in 1700, 1800, 1900 ad 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- more and more students choose to go to another country for their higher education. Do you think the benefits outweigh the problems associated with it? 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01265822785 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7803185873 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5835463653 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308154335566 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166658458694 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456773982016 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205751783351 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347867885244 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.