The given vertical graph delineates the data regarding the total fertility rate in five various nations Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, S Arabia and the UAE in 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that, all the given five countries were showing the highest fertility rate in 1990 as compared to 2000.
It is crystal clear that, in 1990, Bahrain and Kuwait had the similar average of children born per women was around 3. 5 which was decreased in 2000 by 10% respectively. Whereas, in Qatar, the fertility rate was quite different from Bahrain and Kuwait. In 1990, the fertility rate began at about 4. 1 however, which was declined in 2000 and reached nearby 3.5.
Moving further, In 1990, the average children born per women in Oman was 7 and less than 7 was in S Arabia. A slight downward trend was observed in the fertility rate in Oman and S Arabia which was comprised at almost 5. 5 in 2000 respectively. On contrast, in the UAE the fertility rate was 4 which was gone down in 2000 by 11% and accounted at approximately less than 3
- the chart below shows the process of waste paper recycle 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 92
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of a house or a building they are living in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of jounal articles read per week by all students phD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56382978723 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53171374134 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9347524772 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102808814115 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545828622015 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421179430683 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689217425892 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275692036013 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.