Given bar chart gives information about the proportion of car use for different purposes by women and men in 2005
At first a glance it is clearly evident that going to work was the main reason for car use for both gender. Males used more than 50 percentage of their drives to work while females stand at around 40 percentage for the same. Females drove more for shopping purposes than man, it was around 18% for them but male accounted only 10%.
Male drivers domin ate in recreational purposes and visiting town, for recreation males used more than 10% incontrast female stands lower than 5%. Likewise, for visiting town males used cars almost 10%, at the same time females drove least for this purpose. On the otherhand, females drove more for courses, Running Errands, Bank and visiting friends. For the trip to courses females spend almost 12% while that of male was lower than 10%. For bank purposes female drove near three folds much as man do, besides Running Errands females spend four times than men. Finally, females were visiting friends than their counterparts, as shown in the graph, two times females used car for this purpose compared to men.
Overall, men exeeded women in only 3 sectors; work, visiting town and recreation, however females overwhelmed men for the rest.
- the development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. what are advantages and disadvantages? 67
- ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF TECHNOLOGY 11
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 22
- The map shows the development of an area from 1962 to present today. 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given bar chart gives information about the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86818181818 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28575809802 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8837362533 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0658138401871 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311052832405 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424126903568 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664489533641 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717779404586 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.