The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007
The bar chart provides information about the time spent by adolescents of Chester each week doing various activities in 6 years from 2002 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the most popular activity is watching television, while Bowling is the least popular.
The number of hours teenagers spent watching television every week started at 25 hours in 2002. This figure rose steadily to reach a peak at just below 40 hours by the final year.
Time spent in other activities like going to pubs/discos and shopping grew over the years consistently.
The number of hours teenagers spent doing homework and doing sport decreased over the period given. The time spent watching DVDs grew from 2002 to 2004 reaching a peak at around 18 hours. From this point, the figure dropped significantly to 10 hours in 2007.
Bowling was the least favorite activity which fell markedly from just below 5% in 2002 to around 2% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Komaldeep | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 11 | view |
- The pie charts show the percentage of students joining North West University 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 61
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 78
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91772151899 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47606714534 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.456518174 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353319279202 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143206682929 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992670188398 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171951221733 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113294578621 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.