The bar chart below depicts the number of students in three different courses from 2001 to 2004.
It is clear that the figure of course A uneven over 4 years, and course B increased significantly but dropped back as the same.In the last year on the chart, course C was grow up.
Starting with 4,1 million students in 2001 of course A, while one half of that on course B at above 2 million. After a year, the proportion pupils in course A decreased about 2,5 million. In the last 2 years, course A recorded 3,5 and 4,5 million respectively. Perhaps around 4,2 million scholars was the maximum of course B in 2002, because in 2003 and 2004 course B diminished at lower 2 and 3 million alternately.
In the first 2 years, course C almost no change approximately 2 million pupils. There were 3 million of people going to the course C in 2003. In the final year, the figure of class C constantly climbed by 5 million. This number took the lead over the period shown.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nificantly but dropped back as the same.In the last year on the chart, course C wa...
^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...he last year on the chart, course C was grow up. Starting with 4,1 million student...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42134831461 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57936148465 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.845827887 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249440381187 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12176956305 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176202677845 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234966591831 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.234253043681 0.0819641961636 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.