The bar chart illustrates the proportion of males and females in Australia in different age groups who took exercise on a regular basis.
Looking at the chart, it is clear that there was an oscillation in the number of people doing physical activities regularly on both genders. The percentage of Australian men was highest at teenagers, but then tended to decrease at the age 35 to 44 and after that, it rose again in elderly. In contrast, the figure for women was lowest at the age 15 to 24, which climbed to the highest at the age 45 to 54 and afterward declined when older.
With regard to males, the proportion of people taking exercise on a regular basis reached a peak of 52.8 % at the age for teenagers. This figure decreased by about 13 % at the age 35 to 44, which hit a low of 39.5 %. When there was a growth in age, this figure tended to increase and reached at 46.7 % at the age of 65 and older.
In terms of women, the percentage of them who doing physical activities regularly registered at 47.7 % in young females, There was an increase in this figure which peaked at 53.3 % at the age of 45 to 54. But then, the lowest proportion of females taking regular exercise declined and stood at 47.1 % in elderly.
- Some people think that only the best students should be rewarded Others however it is more important to reward student who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Explain your rea 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46875 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53350702017 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9308666796 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22734374025 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11141305225 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761467377762 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173020370958 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733255937641 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46875 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53350702017 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9308666796 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22734374025 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11141305225 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761467377762 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173020370958 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733255937641 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.