The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar chart depicts the proportion of females and males in different age ranges in Australia who regularly participated in muscular actions in 2010. Overall, most of age groups witnessed a higher percentage of women involving in bodily tasks than men except for the age from 15 to 24 and over 65.

It is evident that the smallest percentage of Australian males taking part in physical activities belonged to the age range from 35 to 44, with 39.5%. In comparison with the female figure, women who were aged over 65 accounted for the lowest percentage of their involvement in these tasks, which was still 7.2% higher than the former data. Moreover, the age range from 15 to 24 witnessed the highest proportion of men usually practicing their muscles in 2010.

Furthermore, in regards to the age group of over 65, both sexes have nearly similar percentages to each other, with 46.7% for men and 47.1% for women. Additionally, males were more active than females when they were from 15 to 24 years old, with 52.8% and 47.7% respectively. Apart from the two previous age groups, the others witnessed a lower proportion of Australian men than women in terms of their participation in tasks related to moving their bodies.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...age range from 35 to 44, with 39.5%. In comparison with the female figure, women who were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... their muscles in 2010. Furthermore, in regards to the age group of over 65, both sexes ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, apart from, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89903846154 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66600735732 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4746384843 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306935576775 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140967076157 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671637934955 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235726652666 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732322824218 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.