The proportion of Australian males and females doing daily exercises is depicted in the barchart. The chart contains six different age groups ranging from 15 to above 65. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the rate of women doing regular activities outweighed that of men in the majority of groups. Meanwhile, the gap became narrow when people got older.
Regarding the age group of 15 to 24, the proportion of men taking part in daily exercises was 52,8%, which was 5% higher than that of women. However, in the next two age groups, the gap between men and women doing regular physical activities extended as from 25 to 34, the rate of women exercising was just under 50%, while that of men was 42,2%. The similarity was witnessed in the age groups of 35 to 44, the percentage of women who take daily activities was significantly higher than that of men with 52,5% and nearly 40% respectively.
Moving on to describe the remaining part of the chart, in the age groups of 45 to 54 and 55 to 64, the rate of women doing regular activities was nearly 10% and 8% respectively higher than the proportion of men. However, in the last group, 65 and older, both statistic were approximately equal at neary 47%.
- how do you find about the party 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Moving on to describe the remaining part of the chart, in the age groups of 45 to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62790697674 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61088953923 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1753657682 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314622076097 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127718316064 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775504199542 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214002993685 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025589987713 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.