There are two charts given. The bar chart depicts the CO2 emissions for various mode of transportation in the European Union. The pie chart shows the fund allocated by the European Union for the various mode of transportation. In the bar chart air transport accounts for a clean majority of above 350 grams of carbon emission per person to a kilometer. Inversely, a very meagre amount of 1% of the fund is being supported to the air transport by the European Union.
The roadways given in the bar chart passenger cars, buses, coaches accommodates around 240 grams of carbon emission, which can be correlated to the majority of the fund diverted for the roadways. Nearly 52% of the fund has been assigned for the roadways. Meanwhile, the sea transports' carbon emission have been a minor value of 50 grams of carbon emission as shown in the bar chart. Seaway share of fund shows a merely 1% of inland waterway and 2% for ports as given in the pie chart. Surprisingly, the fund sliced for railways is 31% of the total, while the carbon emission is just 50 grams per passenger/km forming a more viable mode of transport as per the given charts. Other transports and intermodal accounts for the least share of funds from the European Union.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 83
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 50
- Nowadays more and more people prefer to buy fashionable clothes Does this have positive or negative effect Give reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner quot Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Ce 58
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service These organizations have a great need for volunteers but in recent years the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined Th 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70046082949 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66770527744 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7178978923 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7272727273 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475125763602 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207617118101 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111680335087 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.419879480893 0.15604864568 269% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908245033273 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.