The bar graph illustrates the features of GDP - namely Information Technology and Service Industry - in the United Kingdom between 1992 and 2000 and is measured in percentages.
Overall it is immediately apparent both production went up over the 8-year period. However, the former witnessed a more substantial upward trend than the latter.
At the beginning of the period, there was a slight diverse between industries by demonstrating 6 % and 4 % respectively. Similarly, the steady growth remained the static the following years. Consequently, in 1994, IT was just merely 2 % larger than Service. However, the during the next two years IT Industry rose minimally by almost 8 %, whilst the another one, in stark contrast, stayed unchangable by climbing. Although, the first four years saw a slow difference between them, while the last two years experienced a significant various in the aspects of GPD. In 1998, IT rose to 12 %, whereas the service accounted for almost three-quarters of that. Finally, it ended up by displaying the first feature twice as much as the second part.
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 78
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The bar chart below shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001/2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24855491329 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02581485811 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693641618497 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7306241666 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0702746109444 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240608941379 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060539207081 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713931639744 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927887971759 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.