The diagram depicts the differences in sports preference in the three years 1995, 2000 and 2005. Looking at the chart more closely, one can see that most people enjoyed football throughout the years, while Golf is the least chosen sport.
In 1995, more than 40% of people choose football ad their interest, which is also the highest figure. During the same period, Snooker and Tennis were the second choices of respondents with approximately 30%. In terms of Golf, only 17% of people are interested in this activity. After five years, people's decisions did not change too much. There was an increase in Swimming by nearly 10% compared to 1995, whereas only 18% of people enjoyed Rugby.
In the year 2005, football still ranked as the most popular sport, right after that is Swimming and Rugby with roughly 37%. The proportion of Snooker was higher than Tennis by three percent. Golf kept the least interesting sport as only a few people selected it in three separate years.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and the planned future development of the site 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices 78
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and solutions 78
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to sport'
Suggestion: to sport
...e years, while Golf is the least chosen sport. In 1995, more than 40% of people c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31876852505 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66265060241 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1197014907 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.6 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176204585844 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691588185916 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552894697764 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128877094435 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465662371082 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.