The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050.
The bar chart compares the proportion of dependents in five various countries around the world between 2000 and 2050. Overall, it is obvious that the average percentage of world independents is predicted to rise to about 42% in 2050 from around 25% in 2000.
Starting with 2000, of all the five countries India possessed the highest percentage dependents, at almost 40%, while Korea the lowest proportion, at just below 20%. The numbers of dependents in Indonesia, China and Japan were the same, at about 35%.
Turning now to the future of 2050, the percentage of the Korean dependents is estimated to ascend most greatly to about 42% in 2050. Meanwhile, the rate in Japan is forecast to increase by 12% to the highest position at 47% in 2050. It is meanwhile to notice that the numbers in Indonesia and China are expected to grow by the same percentage to 39% in 2050. However, in India, the proportion of the dependents will decline to around 30% in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-16 | EriolYang | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74850299401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64838595216 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9133170397 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424691099129 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183637059155 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156662630591 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296915606775 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169656021307 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.