The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050.
The bar chart compares how many dependents there were in 2000 and will be in 2050 in five various countries around the world. Overall, it is obvious that the average percentage of world independents is predicted to rise to about 42% in 2050 from around 25% in 2000.
Starting with Indonesia, China, Korea and Japan, there will be an increase in the number of dependents from 2000 to 2050. A significant rise can be seen in the percentage of Korean independents, rising from the lowest point (about 20%) in 2000 to 40% in 2050. Also, the proportion of Japanese dependents will have reached the peak at about 50% in 2050. Meanwhile, the number of dependents in both China and Indonesia will increase by the same percentage (5%), from nearly 30% to approximately 35%.
Turning now to India, however, five decades will witness a modest decrease in the number of Indian dependents, from 35% to 27%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-16 | EriolYang | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might these problems be reduced 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75483870968 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69122751084 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.5327172807 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341912659979 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167110347242 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142008004383 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236984830105 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195554779109 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.