The given bar chart illustrates the number of scores of three teams namely A, B and C through 4 seasons from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team B achieved the highest average scores during the period while team A scored fewer and team C scored the lowest. In addition, the number of scores of three teams always fluctuated over four years.
At the first glance, commencing with 5 scores in 2002, team A was inferior to the two ones. In the next season, the number doubled (11 scores) and in 2004, the number peaked at 35 scores, which was seven times higher than the first one. By contrast, in the final season, the figure tumbled to 8 scores. Similarly, in 2002, team C scored 10 goals, twofold team A. Next season, the number increased 5 more scores but decrease to 12 scores in 2004 and continued dropping to 5 scores in 2005, the same as team A's starting point.
At a second glance, team B created the most notable difference. The number was 82 scores in 2002, more than 16 and 8 times higher than team A and team B scores. In 2003, the figure declined to 60 and in 2004, it was 43, however, it was always prominent in the chart. In the last season, team B scored 55, not extremely high as it used to be, but always higher than the others.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantage 89
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods peoplenowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any re 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34334763948 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25817970147 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489270386266 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7194970662 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218295567014 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100697339984 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509009218232 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164232805496 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034125291166 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.