the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a, b nd c over four different seasons. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the scores of three teams over four consecutive seasons from 2002 to 2005.

Overall, team B won the most scores over the span of time. Meanwhile, team A and team C showed a mediocre performance.

Team B was the best compared to the other two teams during the period. It accumulated 82 points in the season of 2002; whilst, team A and team C merely scored 5 points and 10 points respectively. It was likewise impressively outstanding in the season of 2003 and 2005. By contrast, the season of 2004 was the bottom of its record.

Team C was the inferior team of the three. It was rewarded 15 points for the season of 2003, which was the peak record. In addition, team C scored 5 points in the season of 2005, that was the worst season. By comparison, team A accumulateed 35 points in the season of 2004, which was the best performance. The other season were medeocre performance.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consecutive seasons from 2002 to 2005. Overall, team B won the most scores over...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56707317073 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71737173777 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481707317073 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 23.4181494192 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.4166666667 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163943514157 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813959531542 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656161696753 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14626685896 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669564853646 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 92.12 61.2550243902 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.6 10.3012195122 35% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.