The bar chart given here presents the annual scores achieved by the teams A,B and C in the years 2002-2005. As is shown by the chart, Team B, compared to team A and team C, had the highest scores over the four different seasons.
As can be seen from the chart, team B's scores saw a relative decrease in the years 2003 and 2004, however, there was a late increase in the score of team B in the year 2005, as it rose from 43 in 2004 to 55 in 2005.
Turning to team A, their score increased gradually from five points in 2002 to 11 points in 2003, and then to 35 points in 2004, before experiencing a sharp drop in 2005 with just 8 points.
Team C presents an unstable scoring over these years, with 10,15,12 and 5 points over the years 2002,2003,2004 and 2005, respectively.
To sum, while the most obvious feature is that team B kept its superiority over these years, team A and team C swapped the second place in the years 2004 and 2005 compared to the first two years.
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...he annual scores achieved by the teams A,B and C in the years 2002-2005. As is sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29032258065 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34753618047 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1825205639 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202875215937 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132640967328 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074112872695 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129900245672 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823386378145 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 82.31 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.