The chart compares the rate of female and male pupils in six countries expertly used a second language.
It is clear that the proportion of female students in other countries tends to be better at a foreign tongue than their male counterparts (except for Thailand). Moreover, the share of people having learned such a language well in India is the highest.
The percentage of female students in India is the highest, at almost 70%, while the figure for Romina was also relatively high, at over 63%. In contrast, the rate of women using a foreign language other than their mother tongue in Thailand was the lowest, below 28%. At the same time, this share was only slightly higher in China than in Thailand, at about 30%. Meanwhile, the proportion of informal language speakers in Russia and Vietnam is 42% and 56%, respectively.
For male students, the highest usage rate is still in India, around 56%. In contrast, approximately 15% of those people were fluent in another language. In Romania, this proportion was 42%. Meanwhile, the rate of those speaking another language in Russia and Vietnam is 35% and approximately 45% respectively. While, the figure for Thailand seems to be lower, at about 30%.
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the world 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand overa 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
- Some people hold that we should spend money and time on the protection of wild animals while others suggest that the money should be spent on populations living in the poorest areas of the world What is your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, second, so, still, well, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97044334975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65228738222 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6823941731 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109585644812 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402973305014 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324093747312 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698554624583 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305329732474 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.