The bar charts illustrate the number of people marrige and divorce in eight nations in two years (1981 and 1994).
Overall, except Denmark in other countries, it can be seen that in 1981 the marrige rate was more than in 1994, while the number of divorce in 1994 mort than in 1981.
USA has the biggest number of marriage in 1981 and 1994 (over 10 per thousand people and under 8 per thousand people repectively). In Europe countries, it was around 6 per thousand people marrige in both years but except Denmark, the trend was downward. In Japan, the rate was similar in two periods (over 6 per thousand people).
There were a fall in number of divorce in USA and Denmark but the rate in USA was more than Denmark (in USA, it was over 5 per thousand people in 1981 and under 3 per thousand people in 1994 and in Denmark, it was under 3 per thousand people in both years). In UK and Finland, the trend of divorce was obviously upward (around 3 per thousand people). There was similar the rate of divorce in Japan, Germany and Frence in both periods. Italy has the least rate of divorce in countries (under 500 per people in two years).
- the flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment 70
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- Cement and concrete production 56
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3619047619 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20461276879 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.371428571429 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9858234706 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925278783154 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580934020062 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543334468708 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923225490506 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05606011523 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.