The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.
The picture illustrates how many hours of teaching were taught by each teacher from many different continents in 2001.
In general, the figure for upper secondary was moved upwards. the figure for other kinds of that had some fluctuations over the timeline.
in terms of hours recorded in primary and lower secondary school were equally, respectively 600 hours over the period, while the amount of hours in upper secondary school in Spain was higher than the figure for japan, respectively 980 and 650 during the period. However, the figure for the remaining of Spain were equal categories compared to japan, with 600 hours per year.
Thereafter, the amount of hours taught at upper secondary in the USA reached a peak, at 1050 hours per year, which was the most common over the period. In addition, the figure for a primary school in Ireland was less common than in the USA, respectively 850 and 600 hours over the period, while the figure for lower secondary school was higher than in Ireland, respectively 1030 and 800 over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | chau hoang | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | euphorianmt | view | |
| 2023-09-08 | euphorianmt | view | |
| 2023-09-08 | euphorianmt | view | |
| 2023-09-08 | euphorianmt | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 73
- Technology can bring many benefits But it can also cause social and environmental problems To what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 84
- The graph shows information about the average number of visitors entering a museum in summer and winter in 2003 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...aching were taught by each teacher from many different continents in 2001. In general, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... for upper secondary was moved upwards. the figure for other kinds of that had some...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...some fluctuations over the timeline. in terms of hours recorded in primary and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9209039548 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46120267207 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463276836158 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1369389325 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132145138774 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070005597175 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824672716809 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102485888722 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948439094749 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.