The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001

The bar chart demonstrates how much time the teacher used to teach their students in different standards of schools in four particular countries in 2001.

Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that in every country the higher the standards, the higher the teaching hours. Among those countries, the USA's teachers spent more time teaching the students, while in this case, the Japanese teachers had been passed less time to teach than all others.

Regarding Japan and the USA, in 2001 the US's primary teachers taught more than 150 hours compared with the Japanese, while they utilized 600 hours in the whole year to instruct their pupils. In the other two sectors, the difference was far more, the USA used almost 1200 hours to learn the upper secondary students, on the other hand, Japan gave 700 hours to their students, and it is similar to the lower secondary.

Turning to Spain and Iceland, both countries used almost the same time which was 900 and just over 900 respectively for the purpose of teaching the upper secondary scholars. When it came to the lower secondary, then a significant difference between them was observed, whereas Iceland utilized 600 hours to giving instruction to their learner, while Spain gave more than 150 hours.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...rticular countries in 2001. Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that in ev...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, then, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99526066351 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4081519647 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582938388626 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.4999190151 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271568427114 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129399965432 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11092789061 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188133252647 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12120747171 0.0819641961636 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.