The bar charts compares the percentage of energy from five different sources, namely oil, coal, gas, nuclear power and other renewable sources which was consumed in the UK and the US over two separate years: 2000 and 2006.
Overall, it is a clear evident that oil energy was the most used type of energy, whereas the energy from other nuclear resources was used the least in both countries. Moreover, the US used energy from oil and coal more than the UK, while the opposite trend was true for gas, nuclear power and other renewable energy.
In the year 2000, the oil energy usage was about 37% in the USA, compared to around 28% in the UK. The figures for coal energy in the US was lower, at 35%; while the figure was 30% in the UK. The UK people consumed approximately 20%, 15% and 10% of energy made from gas, nuclear power and other renewable sources, respectively. In comparison with the UK, the figures for the US were only about 15% and 5% in terms of these sources.
2006 saw a higher oil energy consumption in the US, at 40%; compared with 30% in the UK. On the other hand, the US experienced a lower percentage of energy usage, at 25%; while the figure for the UK was below 15%. Almost 40% of gas energy was used by the UK, compared to 25% in the US. There were only around 10% and 7% of energy from nuclear power and renewable source consumed by the citizens in these countries.
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in United Kingdom Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 78
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in United Kingdom Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 73
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The bar charts compares the percentage of energy from five diff...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...her renewable sources, respectively. In comparison with the UK, the figures for the US wer...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42248062016 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24690226701 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453488372093 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8577455558 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311280501396 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146285899633 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752447257583 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218851532887 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743857729641 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.