The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph reveals the rate of worldwide population and the spreading of fortune in six different regions of the world. Overall, the percentage of wealth in the developed countries are higher significantly. On contrary, the developing countries have the bigger rate of inhabitants.
To begin with, North America only have around 5% of people who lives, but the distribution of asset considerably reaches a peak at almost 35% as the highest of all areas. Similarly, the citizens in Europe and Rich Asia-Pacific stand at 15% and 5%, but they have 30% and approximately 25% of the global riches.
On the other hand, the global prosperity in China, Other Asia-Pacific, India, Africa, and Latin America and Caribbean are dramatically lower than the rest of sectors. China has been founded as the most populous country which has 30% of the world’s population with owned about 2% of the world’s wealth. Furthermore, India was the lowest rate of universal fortune which hold at less than 1% although, the residents rose to around 15%.
- Some people think the secondary school should study non-academic subjects such as Civic or Religious Studies. Others argue that this a waste of time and those children should only study academic subjects like mathematics and science. 84
- Today more and more students are deciding to move to a different country for higher studies Do you think that the benefits of this outweigh the problems 90
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirementTo what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Similarly, the citizens in Europe and Rich Asia-Pacific stand at 15% and 5%, b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96533606748 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3416816972 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111770997627 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460372606551 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281293142407 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708499138322 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00504853217149 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.