The bar chart compares population and wealth shares in different parts of the world.
Generally, it is noticeable that in the majority of regions the population shares are higher than the other proportions. Both Indian and African populations of 10% and 16% respectively, own less than a percent of the wealth. Furthermore, despite accounting for the highest 23% of people, China has a modest 3% of population share.
By contrast, the patterns for North America, Europe and rich Asia-Pacific are reversed. Although North America and the rich Asia-Pacific account for approximately 5% of the global population, they possess 34% and a quarter of the global wealth. However, Europe is reported to have the highest compared with the other countries. There is a significant 15% of the population in Europe, while its wealth is about a third of the global economy.
Overall, the majority of different areas contribute more to the global population than to the economy, whereas the countries with the highest wealth distribution have the least percentages of people.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 53
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99307736464 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2556083358 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181929965888 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762066964038 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466153561986 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114047043897 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160478042113 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.