The bar chart illustrates on the proportion of British people of five different ages according money to donation for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that a percentage of British people gave money to charity in 1990 than they did in 2010. In addition, elder people doneted more for charity than younger counterparts.
About over 15 percent of people aged from 18 to 25 years old im 1990 devoted to charity and about 17 percent in 2010. The percentage of people between 51 and 65 years old spent more money for donation in 1990 whereas the proportion of people from 36to 50 years of age devoted more money for charity in 2010, which accounted for over 40 percent. In contrast, for the youngest people was the lowest in 2010, at above 5 percent. The percentage of British people advent of the age of 65 years old dropped dramatically their donation to charity between 1990 and 2010.
More specifically, regarding the quantity of 18 - 25 years old people were over 15% in 1990, however it considerably dropped to 5% in 2010.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70491803279 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57031894154 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469945355191 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7962255794 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313769787973 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172535083693 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682452542852 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210870780779 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686758047591 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.